The Non-Relevance of Society and the Ulitmate Solution

The Non-Relevance of a Society and the Ultimate Solution

An Essay By Taylor “Jed” Haynes

Part I: Fundamentally Flawed

Many people today believe our government is corrupt, in one way or another but not fully corrupt. There are also some who believe it to be a fully corrupt mess of secret people controlling everything behind the scenes to take advantage of the citizens. This is not true. While there is, and this is a fact; because how many times have we seen individuals try to use their governmental position for self gain, people in the governmental ranks that are corrupt. Just take a look at the Watergate scandal in which Richard Nixon tried to eliminate other party candidates, and in his defense said that the President is “above the law”, and in nowhere in the United States Constitution does it say that. This is why there is a system of checks and balances between the three branches. That was his personal belief. Even though this essay will ultimately be in relation to all the governments of the world, for now it is focused on the Untied States government.

The main goal of a government is to govern the people. Place an order in society so that it is not some sporadic free-for-all frenzy where everyone is stealing and murdering. Another goal is to eliminate what they claim is “immoral”. This is the area in which every single government that has ever existed has failed. To go back to the very first recorded government, the Bible, God’s Will was the law. What God said goes, and there is a list of things you can find everywhere in the Bible of which are “immoral”. Even the most perfect and most knowledgeable being to ever exist could not even stop the “immoral” things from happening. And the first account is even before humans where a plentiful species on the Earth, when the angel Lucifer went against God’s Will and tricked Adam and Eve to eat from the Forbidden Tree. If even the supreme being of the universe can not do it, and his only solution is to kill countless numbers of innocent people just because they believe different, what are we as a society to do? Is it simply “moral” to kill people just because they believe different? Or is God simply “above the law”? Would you kill someone just because they do not think carrots taste good?

Spirituality and the actual sense of taste by the tongue are metaphors for each other. If a person does not like the taste of a certain food, and you do, is that a bad thing? It just is not in that person’s ability to like that taste. It is not their fault. It is because of the way humans as a species are. We are individuals. We have individual traits. Just like spirituality, some people believe in God, some believe in Buddha; some people like carrots, some do not; is it right for those people to lose their existence because they have different “tastes” in spirituality? Books like the Bible were created to influence people. Just like the television commercials we all see everyday influence us to buy a service or product. They are trying to sell you on an idea.

Dependence is the fatal flaw in society and its governments. Yet schools that are run by those same governments teach you to be independent. You are relying the ideas of a collective instead your own unique understanding system imparted on you by nature. Did Steve Jobs rely on other persons’ understandings when he created the personal computer? No, they said it could not be done, that computers were supposed to be giant industrial machines. But he did it, and Apple is one of the most successful Corporations in existence today. As to, Nicolas Copernicus wrote a theory describing that the Earth was indeed not the center of the universe. Many others like Galileo eventually challenged the Catholic Church on this idea, them, the church, believing the Earth was indeed the center of the universe. Giordano Bruno also challenged the Catholic Church that Copernicus’ theory was the correct one, and they burned him at the stake for heresy, which is ultimately not believing like everyone else; and to note, even though everyone else was wrong. We are told to be individuals, yet we are always criticized for being individuals. There is something seriously wrong with society.

There are two fundamental equations of society we can consider in finding the cause of the a delusional society:

Man-made: A confusion of where we came from and how all things came to be along with how they function equaled theories of creation which equaled no evidence of these theories which, in turn, equaled an opportunity to make things how one person wanted them instead of a common good, which equaled an opportunity to force people to have the same ideals therefore equaling a government which regulates society.
Spiritual: A creation of a self-aware race without in contribution to the nature of time equals government swiftly trust in place to correct the anomaly equals trained thoughts of right and wrong therefore with the subtraction of the “holy government” equals dependence relied on others equals a government which regulates society.

If it was a fundamental flaw in our creation by a holy body, or a reliance on the weak minded who could not be dissipated from the gene pool, is a mystery that will forever exist because no person living today has been at creation, or watched the evolution process take place step-by-step. Knowing where the human race started is in no relation to our existence today, and we are flawed to think it matters. What matters is to not to continually make the same mistakes like we are today.

Part II: The Ultimate Solution

Evolution must take place. It is the way of nature – the way of the universe. All creatures adapt and then evolve so that in the continuation of their species the need to adapt will not be necessary and will prove success for there species to be the dominate life form, which is the goal of all species – to be the dominate life form. All humans are doing today is adapting, not evolving. If we are overweight, we go an exercise or eat better. What if our bodies were developed so that the better controlled fat storage and usage so that no one we be able to get overweight? Well as long as people who have great metabolisms breed with people who have weight problems, there is no way to create a not need for adapting. Why do they do this – become mates with other persons who aren’t physically how we desire them to be? Personality. To become the superior and advanced race that we undoubtedly have the potential to become we need to set aside the hallucinations that blind us from doing so.

The first step is to eliminate those who have nothing to provide to better the human race. Women are not put in combat roles or situations in our military. This is because when a female is in a life or death situation their physiological response is to break-down. They panic and cry instead of being calm and taking action. Contrary, the males of our race, in a life or death situation, automatically enter survival mode. They will do whatever it is necessary for them to stay alive, and if this means they need to be calm so they can devise a logical plan, that is what will happen. A flaw in the male though, is that we do not have the creativeness in our logic as such females do. What if you could make a female with their natural creative logic and also eliminate the break-down response in life or death situations? Or in turn, a male with his natural ability to survive and include a very creative logic? There are always anomalies in the traits of humans, so if you only females with the ability to survive in life or death situations and eliminated the ones who did not, it would only have the genes of the females that do have the ability instead of a surplus of the ones who do not. Why breed ones who are chronically sick? If we did not have these people, we would not have to waste countless resources for something that is not going to better the race. It is not necessary for us to continually provide for the weak just because it is the “right” thing to do. Evolution exists for us to better ourselves to eliminate those who are weak from the gene pool.

Step two is for us to create real individuality amongst our people. Demolish the current education system. Create individual schools and universities of specific subject matter. This will eliminate the useless parts of our education that just add hours to our schedule instead of preparing us for the work we want to pursue. Demolish opinions from the schools. Teach only proven hard proven facts. Eliminate the idea of theories in development and personal opinion of teachers and professors. This will allow the individual to assume his own position based on cold, hard facts. The only way new theories will be accepted is if they can be proven and challenged in all ways and then proven again. If there are no challenges, it is not accepted.

Final step, abolish all forms of government and forced compliance. We can survive with no government. In a superior society we’ll we not be rampaging the Earth in a sporadic free-for-all. It is not logical to our existence. We will know what is right and wrong not because we are told what is, but because we have came to logical conclusions. If we are told, we have less a chance to actually live on it, instead of if we came to the logical conclusion and found it out by facts and trusting in our individual person. This is what drives us to do right and wrong, a strong believe proved by our own thoughts. It is refreshing to see a child be told not to do something and after asking why it is he/she should not do that to get a response, “because I said so,” and them to ask but why should I listen to you.